同行评审反馈

Thanks for finding the time to chat, James. I just received the peer review feedback on the manuscript, and I wanted to go over some of the points with you.

Of course, Sarah. Happy to help. What's the general gist? Are there any major revisions they're suggesting?

Overall, it's pretty positive, which is a relief. They've raised a few really insightful questions, particularly regarding the methodology section. One reviewer thought our sample size might be perceived as a limitation.

Ah, yes, I anticipated that might come up. Our rationale for the sample size was laid out in the initial proposal. Perhaps we need to reinforce that argument more explicitly in the manuscript itself.

Exactly. I was thinking we could add a paragraph or two directly addressing that. And another point, they suggested clarifying the implications of our findings for policy-making. They felt we were a bit vague there.

That's a fair point. We focused more on the theoretical contributions. We can definitely expand on the practical applications without overstating our claims. We just need to articulate it more clearly.

I agree. So, for the sample size, I'll draft some revised text, and for the policy implications, maybe we can brainstorm a few specific examples that link directly to our data.

Sounds like a solid plan. Is there anything else that caught your eye that we should discuss now?

Not right now. These two seem to be the most substantive. The rest are minor edits, typos, and formatting issues which I can handle fairly easily. Thanks again for your insights!

Anytime, Sarah. Let me know if you want me to take a look at your revisions once you've drafted them. We'll get this manuscript ready for resubmission.