贸易协定谈判

Good morning, Ambassador Lee. We appreciate you making the time for this critical session. Let's delve into the specifics of the agricultural tariffs.

Good morning, Mr. Davis. Indeed. Our primary concern remains the proposed 15% tariff on our specialty crops. It would significantly impact our farmers.

We understand your concerns, Ambassador, but this tariff is crucial for protecting our emerging domestic industries. Perhaps we could explore a phased reduction over five years?

A phased reduction is certainly a point for discussion, but five years seems rather extended. Would two to three years be more feasible, coupled with some non-tariff concessions on your side?

That's an interesting counter-proposal. What sort of non-tariff concessions do you have in mind, Ambassador? We're open to exploring options that demonstrate mutual benefit.

Specifically, we'd like to see streamlined customs procedures for our manufactured goods and mutual recognition of certain product certifications. This would significantly reduce trade barriers.

Streamlining customs is something we can certainly work towards. Mutual recognition of certifications, however, requires further internal review due to our regulatory frameworks. It's a complex area.

We understand the complexities. Perhaps a commitment to initiate a working group dedicated to harmonizing those standards within the first year of the agreement's implementation? That might bridge the gap.

A working group dedicated to harmonization. That's a constructive approach, Ambassador. Let me consult with my team on that specific timeframe and the agricultural tariff reduction. We're making progress.